This week’s economic calendar includes some key data on the housing market and few other major reports. The debate about the strength of the U.S. economy continues. The housing market is an important contributor to the economy. As we enter the key season for real estate many will be asking:

Is it Springtime for housing?

Prior Theme Recap

In my last WTWA, I predicted that there would be special attention to the mixed message of economic reports, contrasting the relative strength of employment with other data. That was a major theme. Some insisted that the employment was overstated. Others said it was a lagging indicator. A few mentioned that GDP was probably understated. Friday’s relatively strong data continued the mixed message. I also suggested that the political sideshow would grab attention, but that was obvious.

Once again the early strength faded at the end of the week. Doug Short captures the story of the decline, the third straight) with his excellent weekly chart. (With the ever-increasing effects from foreign markets, you should also add Doug’s World Markets Weekend Update to your reading list).

 

The weekly chart adds more analysis on the major themes as well as a multi-year context.

We would all like to know the direction of the market in advance. Good luck with that! Second best is planning what to look for and how to react. That is the purpose of considering possible themes for the week ahead. You can make your own predictions in the comments.

This Week’s Theme

The economic calendar has mostly secondary reports again this week. Friday’s stronger economic data only intensified the debate, as the market reacted negatively. This week features three important housing reports and two of lesser significance. Since springtime brings higher expectations for this sector, I expect more attention than usual. The punditry will be asking:

Is it Springtime for Housing?

Background

Attention focuses on housing with some frequency since it is important to the economy. Wells Fargo notes that residential investment rose 14.8% in the past year, contributing 0.5% to the Q1 GDP growth (which coincidentally was 0.5%). Last year the National Association of Homebuilders calculated that housing was over 15% of GDP. The impact is not just home sales, but also remodeling.

 

Viewpoints

The basic themes, moving from bearish to bullish on stocks are as follows:

  • The real estate market is about to crash (Ron Insana);
  • 0% down has returned. Didn’t we learn anything?
  • Increasing housing prices strain the affordability for new buyers (prices are too high);
  • Millennials do not have adequate credit;
  • Homes held in foreclosure proceedings or by speculators provide low-priced competition; (Whoops. That one changed).
  • Home sales are low because there is insufficient supply (the new version).
  • Interest rates remain at historically low levels, helping affordability;
  • We can expect increasing purchases from young people;
  • Increased home prices enable more people to sell – trading up or even sideways to take new jobs.
  • It is easy to find disciples for each viewpoint.

    As always, I have my own opinion in the conclusion. Make your own choice, and feel free to make your case in the comments.

    But first, let us do our regular update of the last week’s news and data. Readers, especially those new to this series, will benefit from reading the background information.

    Last Week’s Data

    Each week I break down events into good and bad. Often there is an “ugly” and on rare occasion something really good. My working definition of “good” has two components:

  • The news is market-friendly. Our personal policy preferences are not relevant for this test. And especially – no politics.
  • It is better than expectations.
  • The Good

    There was some good news.

  • “Framing” lumber prices are higher. One of the many reasons to follow Calculated Risk is finding data no one else mentions.
  • The “shallow industrial recession” seems to be over. New Deal Democrat provides both data and analysis.
  • Retail sales were much stronger than expected, up 1.3% versus expectations of 0.9%. The retail earnings reports varied widely, with high-end names doing poorly. Online sales were excellent and gas station sales moved higher. (Remember that gas prices have been part of the recent retail weakness). Auto sales remain strong.
  • Life expectancy is higher – and health inequality is lower. Alex Tabarrok of the Foundation For Economic Education presents the data, including the chart below. There is still a downward slope in the data, but the entire line has shifted.
  •  

  • The Michigan sentiment index beat both last month and also expectations by a wide margin – 95.8 versus about 90. This survey gets timely information about job creation and spending that we do not see elsewhere. As always, I recommend looking at the best chart (and also great discussion) from Doug Short. This month I also recommend checking out the Michigan site. You can find long-term charts and a great explanation of the method. Here is the summary of the key forward-looking data:
  •  

  • The job market improved, as indicated by the JOLTs report. I often describe this as the most misunderstood data release. Too many people try to use it to analyze net job growth, something better done with various other sources. The ECRI has a new indicator (something about purple animals) subtracting actual hires from job openings, and somehow inferring weakness if this difference increases. They seem to be on a mission to find something negative in the data. Here is their key chart:
  • Let’s keep this simple.

  • Job openings are good – the more the better.
  • The quit rate shows voluntary departures from jobs, a strong signal of confidence about finding an alternative.
  • The Atlantic has an article that is geared toward non-economists, but explains the key points. The article notes that quits are highest in low-paying jobs and lowest among financial services workers and government employees.

    Doug Short illustrates the strength of the voluntary quit rate versus layoffs.

     

     

    The Bad

    Some of the news was negative.

  • Energy bankruptcies increased, despite rising oil prices. Terry Wade at Reuters suggests that recent oil price increase might be too little, too late for many companies.
  • Rail traffic continues to worsen. Steven Hansen reports the 10.6% y-o-y decline, adding a variety of interesting comparisons.
  • Earnings season continued with mixed data. FactSet has a nice weekly analysis with interesting charts and also a focused discussion on key sectors. Here are some of the main themes:

    • The 71% earnings “beat rate” is higher than usual, but everyone knows the expectations have been lowered.
    • Earnings declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.
    • The sales beat rate was below normal.
    • Many companies cited the strong dollar as a source of weakness, so they expect better future results.
    • Autos and internet sales showed the most strength.
    • A forgiving market did not punish “misses” as much as usual – at least on average.