How Reliant Is Each U.S. State On Foreign Trade?

Foreign trade, as a % of GDP for each state: 

How Reliant Is Each U.S. State on Foreign Trade?

Whether it is lashing out on China for unfairly weakening its currency, or calling out “unfair” government subsidies on Canadian softwood lumber, it’s safe to say that re-opening discussions about foreign trade has become a key priority under President Trump.

Is this the right route to take, and does America really need to negotiate new trade deals?

There are arguments either way, but the reality is that trade agreements like NAFTA are perceived to have a mixed track record of success. Under NAFTA, trade volume has exploded, prices have been lowered, and U.S. reliance on oil imported from the Middle East has decreased, but at the same time, it is clear that manufacturers, especially in the auto industry, have been setting up shop in Mexico. As a result, at least partially, manufacturing jobs hover near all-time lows.

WALKING THE TIGHTROPE

The biggest challenge with acting on these re-negotiation ambitions is that it’s inherently risky, no matter how you slice it. Any big slip up or ill-advised trade war could have a drastic impact on the economy.

Today’s data visualization, which comes to us from HowMuch.net, highlights this risk in a relatable way by showing the reliance on foreign trade as a percentage of GDP for each state.

Here are the state economies most dependent on foreign trade:

Rank State Foreign Trade Trade as % of State GDP, 2015 1 Michigan $178 billion 38.0% 2 Louisiana $84 billion 35.1% 3 South Carolina $70 billion 34.8% 4 Tennessee $110 billion 34.7% 5 Kentucky $66 billion 34.3% 6 Washington $138 billion 30.9% 7 Texas $500 billion 30.7% 8 New Jersey $152 billion 26.7% 9 Georgia $127 billion 25.5% 10 Indiana $82.8 billion 24.6%