Jobs: QCEW Shows Further Evidence Of Wildly Inaccurate Headline Report

Image Source: PixabayThe analysis below covers the Employment picture released on the first Friday of every month. While most of the attention goes to the headline number, it can be helpful to look at the details, revisions, and other reports to get a better gauge of what is really going on.

Current Trends
 The BLS reported a gain of 206k jobs which was above expectations. However, the trend this year has been a wildly divergent Household Survey and that continued again this month. The Household survey reported 116k jobs which is 56.3% of the Headline number.Figure: 1 Primary Report vs Household Survey – MonthlyHalfway through the year, the total jobs from the Household Survey represent just 1.3% of the jobs reported by the Headline Report. For context, while the Headline Report has indicated total jobs of 1.33M, the Household Survey shows 16k jobs YTD. Those are two wildly different views of the labor market!Figure: 2 Primary Report vs Household Survey – AnnualThe BLS also publishes the data behind their Birth/Death assumptions (formation of new business). In June, the BLS assumed 59k jobs added to their birth/death assumptions.Figure: 3 Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions – MonthlyThe annual view shows that birth/death assumptions make up more than 50% of the total jobs added YTD.Figure: 4 Primary Unadjusted Report With Birth Death Assumptions – MonthlyThere is another report published by the BLS called the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). According to the BLS, this is a far more accurate and rigorous report covering 95% of jobs available at a highly detailed level. Due to the rigor, the report is released quarterly on a 7-month lag. The latest report was published at the end of May to show Q4 2023.The QECW was below the Headline Report for all 3 months of Q4 last year.Figure: 5 Primary Report vs QCEW – YearlyOn an annual basis, you can see that the QCEW trailed the Headline number, representing 76% for all of 2023. This is the lowest percentage going back to 2010. The QCEW combined with the Household Survey shows that the Headline Report is clearly inaccurate and that has reached an extreme in 2023 and 2024!Figure: 6 Primary Report vs QCEW – Yearly

Digging Into the Report
 The 206k jobs surprised to the upside but also saw the unemployment rate rising again to 4.1%.Figure: 7 Change by sectorAnother level of detail in the Household report shows full-time vs part-time job holders. In June, there was little change, but the net result was a loss of full-time jobs and a gain in part-time jobs.Figure: 8 Full Time vs Part Time

Jobs by Category
 Only three of the eight categories were above the twelve-month trend.Figure: 9 Current vs TTMThe table below shows a detailed breakdown of the numbers.Figure: 10 Labor Market DetailRevisionsThe chart below shows how the jobs data has been revised in recent months. From January to May, all the months except March have seen downward revisions.Figure: 11 RevisionsOver the last three months, the data has been revised down by an average of 5.7k per month and 17.8k over 12 months. These revisions go unnoticed by the mainstream.Figure: 12 Revisions

Historical Perspective
 The chart below shows data going back to 1955.Figure: 13 Historical Labor MarketThe labor force participation rate is still well below the highs before the Global Financial Crisis. This month it stayed steady at 62.5%.Figure: 14 Labor Market Distribution

Conclusion
 Headline numbers continue to show moderate strength but the Household Survey and QCEW tell an entirely different story. At some point, the reports will converge. It seems very likely that the Household Survey and QCEW are more accurate and communicate the true state of the labor market.More By This Author:Treasury Finally Issues Some Long-Term DebtSummer Feeling Hotter Than Usual? Gold Could Be Too.Liberty & Inflation For All: Fireworks Shows Are Scaling Down