Proration — Friend Or Foe?

Evgeny Gromov-iStockPhoto The recent growth in SEC-registered alternative funds (private BDCs, private REITs, interval funds, and tender funds) is a direct byproduct of wealth management’s efforts to diversify into alternatives.  Unlike the limited partnership interests favored by institutions, these alternative funds offer investor protections, administrative convenience, immediate investment, and enhanced liquidity, all things important to individual investors.  In a few years, these alternative funds have attracted over $100 billion in investor capital.  Of particular interest to investors is the conditional promise of quarterly liquidity (withdrawal) from the alternative funds.  For most funds this means investors can get all their money out in any quarter, if requested withdrawals across all investors does not exceed 5% of net fund assets.  When requested withdrawals exceed 5% it triggers an event called “proration” wherein requested withdrawals are cut back proportionately. The press attention directed at the recent proration experienced by Blackstone’s BREIT fund has raised broader questions about the incidence of proration generally.  To address potential concerns, Cliffwater conducted a three-year study covering 56 SEC-registered alternative funds.  Findings can be summarized as follows:

Our study suggests that investors in alternative funds should have confidence in the availability of quarterly liquidity without the implementation of proration; with exceptions for either prolonged periods of market stress or fund-specific circumstances such as poor performance.More By This Author:A Step Beyond Timber: Considering Private Equity Investments In Wood Products Manufacturing In The United States Portable Alpha: Increased Returns With Reduced Risk Vintage Voodoo